Cows are worshipped in India; God will never forgive us if they are killed: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court, in a recent hearing, emphasized the sacred significance of cows in Indian culture and expressed concern over the treatment of stray cattle. The court, led by Justice Ashutosh Shastri, took a strong stand against the rotting carcasses of cattle found in open areas, stating that even God would not forgive such acts.

The court is actively addressing the issue of stray cattle in Gujarat, hearing petitions seeking contempt of court action against the state government for its perceived failure to tackle the problem. The concern arose after several individuals lost their lives in cattle attacks.

During the proceedings, the court criticized the government’s response and stressed the need for accountability among officials. It acknowledged poor conditions in cattle pounds and granted the cattle owners’ counsel the right to inspect them.

Cows being worshipped in India played a crucial role in the court’s observations. The government’s counsel highlighted the religious aspect and assured that cows are worshipped before being taken to pounds.

The court also delved into traffic regulations, with Advocate General Kamal Trivedi outlining measures to address issues such as illegal parking and wrong-side driving. The court acknowledged these efforts but emphasized citizens’ responsibility in abiding by rules.

A January 5 deadline was set for the strict implementation of traffic measures, with the court requesting a progress report. Justice Shastri emphasized the importance of citizens’ cooperation and civic sense.

In conclusion, the court’s recent actions underscore its commitment to addressing the intertwined issues of stray cattle and traffic problems in Gujarat. The emphasis on cultural values, accountability, and citizen cooperation reflects the court’s dedication to ensuring safety and welfare. As the court continues its efforts, the effectiveness of implemented measures and citizen involvement remains a key focus.

Gujarat High Court Grants ₹1 Lakh Damages Over Email Attachment Error

In a troubling case in Gujarat, a man who had been granted bail in 2020 remained behind bars for an additional three years. The reason? The prison authorities claimed they were unable to open an email attachment containing his bail order sent by the High Court registry. As a result, the Gujarat High Court has ordered the state to compensate the individual with ₹1 lakh.

The man in question, Chandanji Thakor, aged 27, had originally been serving a life sentence for a murder conviction. His sentence was suspended on September 29, 2020, with this information communicated to the prison authorities via email from the High Court registry. Unfortunately, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the email went unnoticed by the jail authorities, and Thakor’s release order remained unimplemented.

According to the prison authorities, they were unable to take the necessary action because they couldn’t open the attachment in the received email. Additionally, the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) did not inform the jail authorities about the suspension of Thakor’s sentence.

Recognizing the gravity of the situation and the negligence on the part of the jail authorities, the Gujarat High Court ruled that the state must pay Thakor ₹1 lakh in compensation. The court stressed that this case serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for improved coordination and communication between legal entities and prison officials.

The court went further by directing all District Legal Services Authorities (DLSAs) to compile data on prisoners who have been granted bail but may still be incarcerated due to various reasons, such as a lack of surety or non-execution of jail bonds. These authorities are tasked with investigating the reasons behind the continued detention of such individuals.

This ruling underscores the critical importance of ensuring that individuals who have been granted bail are released promptly and without undue delay. In Thakor’s case, the failure to open a simple email attachment had a profound impact on his life, resulting in an extended period of incarceration despite being eligible for release on bail.

This case highlights the pressing need for effective procedures to prevent such oversights in the criminal justice system, especially when it comes to implementing court orders for the release of individuals who have been granted bail. It also serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted routine operations and communications, leading to unfortunate situations like Thakor’s prolonged imprisonment.